The global leader in enterprise social media management
For over a decade, Sprinklr Social has helped the world’s biggest brands reimagine social media as a growth driver with a unified platform, industry-leading AI and enterprise-grade scale.
You're Invisible When Things Work and Infamous When They Don't. Here's How to Change That
No one posts about their broadband working like clockwork.
No one creates lengthy threads celebrating an uninterrupted video call.
And no one tags their service provider after watching an hour-long livestream without any buffering or when their 5G connection holds steady in a crowded stadium.
The relationship between telecom brands and their customers is largely invisible when it's functioning but explosively visible the moment it isn't. This is the fundamental tension at the heart of telecom's social media challenge. It's not a brand problem, exactly. It's a structural one. The category has been designed — by its own nature — to be noticed only in failure. And for most telecom brands, social media has simply become the loudest arena for that failure to play out.
But a small number of brands are changing that. Not by spinning bad news or flooding feeds with polished content, but by showing up differently in the moments that actually shape online reputation. The data on how they're doing it is worth examining closely.
The state of Telco on social: Busy but not building
Across the telecom sector, the median Social Index score sits at just 1.7 — the lowest among all five industry verticals analyzed in the Sprinklr Social Index Report.
Besides, more than 60% of telco brands operate in negative sentiment territory, and 82% are stuck in the Presence zone of the social maturity ladder (please refer to the infographic below). In other words, they’re consistently visible but not meaningfully connected.
View infographic
That last statistic deserves particular attention because presence isn’t the same as relevance. A brand in the Presence zone is seen — it posts, responds, and maintains a handle across platforms but isn't building anything. The engagement it generates is largely reactive, driven by complaints and service queries rather than brand community or advocacy. And its social media metrics look like activity, not like growth.
The gap between where most telco brands are and where the top performers operate is significant. The top 10 telco brands in the study carry a median Social Index of 3.2 — nearly double the sector median. They're not operating with fundamentally different resources but definitely operating with a fundamentally different model.
The sentiment gap most brands don't know exists
Here is one of the most important — and most overlooked — findings in the report: there is a 14.6-point median gap in sentiment between how customers communicate in private DMs and how they express themselves in public mentions.
In direct messages, people are measured. They're seeking resolution, so, the tone is transactional, sometimes frustrated but largely contained. In public — on open threads, in replies, in conversations happening around the brand — the tone is harsher, more volatile, and far more visible. In extreme cases, the sentiment gap reaches 115 points.
A brand can appear to be managing its customer relationships effectively based on DM sentiment data, while its public reputation is actively deteriorating in conversations it isn't monitoring and isn't part of.
One UK carrier mentioned in the report presents a clear illustration of this dynamic. The gap between its DM sentiment and its public mention sentiment is 12 points — a divergence it is, notably, actively managing every single day. The fact that it's managing the gap at all puts it ahead of most of its peers, who aren't measuring it.
The practical implication is straightforward: DM sentiment and public mention sentiment are not the same data stream. They should not be reported together, and they should not be treated as interchangeable signals. Brands that build their online reputation strategy on private feedback alone are navigating with an incomplete map — and in telecom, that gap between the map and the territory is where PR crises quietly brew.
Growth doesn't live in your feed
There's a widespread assumption in social media strategy that owned content is the primary lever for growth. In other words, post more, post better, and optimize for engagement on your own handles.
In telecom, the data suggests this assumption is not just insufficient — it may be actively misdirecting investment. Public conversation is approximately 10 times more influential on follower growth than engagement on owned posts.
The moments that drive meaningful brand expansion in this category aren't happening in the brand's feed. They're happening in the broader conversation: outage threads, device launch discussions, network coverage debates, service news cycles. These are high-attention, high-emotion moments — and most telco brands are either absent from them or purely defensive when they arise. The contrast with top performers is sharp.
One global telecom mentioned in the report generates 421 mentions per 1,000 followers — a figure that reflects genuine embeddedness in the public conversation around coverage, devices, and service news. That brand isn't just responding to its own customers. It's present in the conversations its category is having, whether or not it's tagged.
The example above represents a meaningful reallocation of strategic attention: away from polished, scheduled content and toward real-time community engagement in the spaces where reputation is actually being formed.
Friction is an asset if you know how to use it
Higher engagement in telecom frequently signals higher friction. More questions, more complaints, more pressure. The instinct for most social teams is to treat this as a volume management problem — respond faster, clear the queue, reduce visible tension. Leading brands treat it as a different kind of opportunity entirely. Rather than simply reacting faster, the highest-performing telco brands focus on reducing repeat friction. The distinction matters. Reacting faster keeps pace with problems as they arise, whereas, reducing repeat friction addresses the conditions that generate those problems — and does so publicly, in a way that builds credibility rather than simply managing it. The practical expression of this is what might be called a spike kit: a library of pre-approved, plain-English explainers, FAQ frameworks, and context cards built for predictable high-pressure moments such as outages, service disruptions, device launches, billing changes and the like. When attention spikes and customer anxiety is high, having that content ready to deploy immediately does two things simultaneously:
- Speed signals accountability
- Context signals competence
Together, they shift the brand's role from reactive utility to that of a trusted partner.
Customer response time is part of this equation, but not in the way it's typically measured. The top 10 telco brands in the study reply 23 minutes faster than their peers — 55 minutes versus 78. In a sector where a network outage can affect hundreds of thousands of people simultaneously, that 23-minute difference in a moment of maximum public attention is not an operational detail. It’s a brand-defining act.
One Gulf telecom operator maintains an average reply time of 61 minutes and earns a sentiment score of +23 as a result — a figure that stands in stark contrast to a sector median in deeply negative territory. The causal relationship is not coincidental. Showing up with clarity, at speed, in the moments when customers are most anxious about an essential service is precisely how trust is built in a category where trust is historically scarce.
The playbook: 5 shifts that move the needle
For social and marketing teams looking to climb the social maturity ladder from Presence toward Convergence, the data points toward five concrete changes in operating model:
1. Separate your data streams. Public mentions and private DMs measure different things. Treat them as distinct signals and report them separately. The gap between them needs to be analyzed, ignoring it can become a liability.
2. Build for high-attention moments before they happen. Outages, launches, and service news are predictable categories of disruption. Spike kits — pre-approved, context-rich, plain-language content — should be ready before the moment arrives, not assembled during it.
3. Reallocate attention from the inbox to the public square. Engagement on owned posts is a limited growth lever. The brands generating earned reach are the ones participating in broader category conversations — in creator threads, news cycles, and public forums where reputation is built.
4. Make response time a brand metric, not just an SLA. Speed during high-friction moments is not a customer experience KPI. It is a direct signal of accountability that shapes public perception in real time.
5. Measure earned mentions as a primary growth indicator. If your only measure of social performance is engagement on owned content, you're measuring the wrong thing. Earned mentions — the conversations others start about your brand — are the truest sign of whether your brand is gaining or losing ground in public conversations.
The opportunity hidden in the difficult moments
The telco brands that are genuinely surging ahead on social have accepted a counterintuitive truth: the moments of highest pressure are also their greatest opportunities. Every outage is a chance to demonstrate accountability at scale. Every public complaint is a chance to show, visibly, that the brand is listening and responding. Every friction moment, if handled well, is evidence that the brand can be trusted when it matters most.
The moment is the new channel and in telecom, the moments that matter most have historically been the ones brands worked hardest to avoid and the data is clear on what happens when they lean in instead.
This blog draws on findings from the Social Index Report — a study analyzing 1,160 brands across five industries, built from over 1 million data points collected across X, Facebook, and Instagram. Download the report to read the telecom sector analysis in its entirety and other industry-specific playbooks.
